How Film Financing Works: A Producer’s Guide to Funding a Film

Share
Co-productionFilm financingPartnership
Share
FILM FINANCING

By Atul Phadnis and Kunal Barai | Updated: November 2026

Part of the Vitrina film financing hub: financiers by country, Private Briefings and LeaderSpeak episodes on film finance.

What film financing is

Film financing is the work of assembling every dollar a project needs to be developed, produced and delivered. The producer works like an architect here, fitting together money that arrives on different dates, under different contracts, from people with very different appetites for risk.

Those appetites explain everything that follows. An equity investor owns a slice of the film and gets paid only if it earns. A lender wants interest whatever happens at the box office, so it lends against signed contracts. A distributor pays for rights in one territory. A government rebates part of what you spend in its country and asks for nothing back. A good financing plan puts each of these where it is most comfortable, and a weak one asks someone to carry risk they never signed up for.

The same logic applies to TV. A series is usually funded by a commissioning broadcaster or streamer, topped up with incentives, co-production partners and distribution advances, though the commissioner’s licence fee does far more of the work. Our guide to how TV show financing works covers series in detail.

The film financing market in 2026

The money is still there, in different hands. By Vitrina’s count, studio money now backs about 4% of US releases, while production in Europe, Asia Pacific and Latin America has kept growing. The capital filling that space looks very different from the studio model producers grew up with.

Streamers changed the deal. In a commissioned original, the platform usually pays the full budget plus a premium, often called a cost-plus deal, and keeps most of the rights worldwide and for a long time. The producer gets certainty and a fee, and gives up most of the back end. A licence deal works the other way round: the producer finances the film, keeps ownership and licenses it to the platform for set territories and years. Since the streaming slowdown, platforms commission fewer originals and license more finished films, which puts the old independent toolkit (pre-sales, gap loans, incentives) back at the centre.

Private equity moved in. Funds now back slates and production companies rather than single titles, turning production houses into small studios with a predictable pipeline. Our look at film slate financing and private equity explains how those deals are built, and private equity in entertainment covers the larger company-level deals.

Sovereign money became a real option. Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Abu Dhabi now run some of the most generous incentives anywhere, alongside public film funds that co-finance international projects. For a producer, the Gulf has gone from a location question to a financing question.

The catch is fragmentation. More sources means more doors to knock on, each with its own mandate, paperwork and timetable. Producers who know who is active, on what terms, in which territory, close faster than producers working from last year’s contact list.

The capital stack: how the pieces fit

The capital stack is the full list of money in a film, ordered by who gets repaid first. Reading it from the top tells you who carries the least risk. Reading it from the bottom tells you who stands to gain the most.

Layer Typical sources Risk Return
Senior debt Bank loans against pre-sales, MGs and tax credits Lowest Interest and fees
Mezzanine and gap Gap loans, bridge loans, mezzanine funds Medium Higher interest, sometimes a profit share
Equity Private investors, film funds, family offices, private equity Highest A share of profits, usually with a premium of 20% or more on recoupment
Soft money Tax incentives, grants, public funds None for the producer Not repaid, or repaid on soft terms

Two films with the same budget can carry very different stacks. A UK drama with strong cultural credentials might lean on public funds and tax relief. A US genre film with a known cast might lean on pre-sales and gap debt. Getting the stack right for the project is half the job, and it drives everything a financier asks you later.

The main sources of film money

Source Who provides it Typical share of budget When they get paid back
Equity Private investors, film funds, family offices 20% to 60% Late in the waterfall, after lenders
Gap and bank debt Banks, specialist lenders 10% to 30% First, with interest
Pre-sales Territory distributors 15% to 40% Through the rights they bought
Co-production A producer in another country 20% to 50% As negotiated
Tax incentives Governments 10% to 40% Never: a rebate on qualifying spend
Soft money Public funds, grants 5% to 25% Usually never

These ranges are typical for independent films. Any single project can sit outside them.

Equity financing

Equity investors buy a share of the film, or of the company making it. They carry the most risk and sit near the bottom of the waterfall, so equity usually closes the budget last, once the safer layers are signed. Producers sweeten the deal with a recoupment premium (investors get back their money plus 20% or so before profits are split) and a share of net profits, often 50%.

Four kinds of equity investor show up, and each wants a different pitch. Angels write personal cheques of roughly $50,000 to $500,000 and often care about the project as much as the return, sometimes asking for a producer credit. Film funds put $500,000 to $5 million into a title and spread risk across several. Family offices take a longer view and often value the cultural side of the asset. Private equity firms rarely engage under $10 million and prefer slates or company stakes to single films.

Returns follow risk. Individual investors in an indie film often look for 15% to 25% a year, while funds with a senior position will accept less. Tax-advantaged schemes such as the UK’s EIS and SEIS, France’s SOFICAs and Section 181 in the US lower the return an investor needs. Experienced investors treat film as patient, high-risk capital, and they back producers who show them a clean chain of title, signed deal memos, a completion bond commitment and a waterfall modelled under cautious, base and upside cases.

Read more: Film slate financing and private equity · How to find private investors for your film

Debt, gap and mezzanine financing

Film debt is a loan against something certain: a signed pre-sale, a confirmed tax credit, a distributor’s guarantee. A specialist bank lends against that paper, discounts it for risk, and is repaid first. A handful of banks and lenders run dedicated entertainment desks, and our guide to film financing banks lists who they are and what they lend against.

Gap financing is the riskier branch. It lends against the territories a film hasn’t sold yet, based on a sales agent’s estimate of what they will fetch. Gap lenders usually cap the loan at 10% to 20% of the budget, charge around 8% to 12% a year and take first position alongside senior debt. Add the arrangement fee, legal costs and the completion bond the lender will insist on, and the all-in cost of a gap loan over an 18-month cycle can run well into the teens as a percentage of the principal. Model that before counting on gap money to close a budget.

Mezzanine money sits between the senior loan and the equity. It costs more than bank debt, carries more risk, and often comes with a small profit share on top of interest. Producers use it when the senior loan and the equity together still leave a hole.

Three more structures are worth knowing:

  • Negative pickup. A distributor agrees to buy the finished film for a fixed sum on delivery, and the producer borrows against that promise. The risk moves from equity investors onto the distributor’s guarantee.
  • Tax credit loan. A lender advances 80% to 90% of a confirmed incentive during the shoot, instead of the producer waiting months for the government to pay.
  • P&A line. A separate loan, secured against a signed distribution deal, that pays for a release’s marketing rather than the production.

Read more: What gap financing is and how it works · Companies that offer gap financing for film · Film financing banks

Pre-sales, pre-buys and minimum guarantees

A pre-sale is a distributor paying for a territory’s rights before the film is finished. The fee is a minimum guarantee, or MG. Usually only a deposit of 10% to 20% is paid on signing and the rest on delivery, so the producer takes the signed contract to a bank and borrows against it. That is why lenders ask who your sales agent is before almost anything else: the agent makes these sales, and their estimates of unsold territories decide how much gap money you can raise.

Banks don’t value every MG the same way. A contract from a large, well-funded distributor might be lent against at 85% to 90% of its face value. One from a smaller buyer might be worth closer to 70%. Markets matter too. Germany, France, Japan, Benelux and Scandinavia have long been the strongest pre-sale territories for independent films, and the market calendar (Berlin, Cannes, AFM, Toronto) sets when most of those deals happen.

A pre-buy is a close cousin, common in TV. A broadcaster or platform commits to a project in development, often pays part of the money upfront, and expects a say in the creative. A pre-sale buys territory rights to a film someone else is making. A pre-buy is closer to a partial commission. Our Private Briefing on pre-buys and pre-sales covers how buyers are using both right now.

Read more: Film pre-sales and bank gap financing · How producers are securing minimum guarantees faster

Co-production and co-financing

A co-production joins producers from two or more countries on one film, so the project can draw on each country’s incentives and public funds. Official co-productions under a bilateral treaty go further: the film can count as domestic content in every partner country, which opens broadcaster quotas and national funds that a foreign film could never touch. Co-financing is a looser arrangement, where a partner puts in money without the treaty status or the shared creative control.

The treaty network is wide. Canada, the UK and France each hold treaties with dozens of countries, and the revised European Convention on Cinematographic Co-Production allows a partner to come in with as little as 5% of the budget on a multilateral project. Regulators look for a real creative and financial contribution from each side. A shell partner who exists only to unlock a rebate can sink the whole structure, and with it every incentive in the stack.

Read more: Co-production vs co-financing: the key differences · Film co-production agreements

Soft money and grants

Soft money is public funding that usually doesn’t need paying back, or is repaid only from profits: grants, development loans, production subsidies and tax incentives. National bodies such as the BFI in the UK, the CNC in France and Telefilm in Canada run the largest schemes, with regional funds, broadcaster development money and festival labs below them.

The money is competitive and comes with conditions. Funds often require cultural content tests, a share of cast and crew from the country, or spending a set amount in a region. Those conditions shape the film: where it shoots, who is hired, sometimes which language it’s in. Plan them into the project early, because a condition you discover late can cost you the fund.

In the US, grants are smaller and more fragmented, mostly from foundations, arts councils and documentary funds. In the Gulf, funds like the Doha Film Institute back MENA projects. Our guide to Doha Film Institute grants covers that route.

Read more: Soft money and how location drives financing · Best film grants for independent filmmakers

Tax incentives

Tax incentives return a share of what a production spends in a country, as a cash rebate or a tax credit. They are tied to spending rather than content, which is why producers so often pick a shoot location by its incentive.

Country Program Headline rate
UK Audio-Visual Expenditure Credit; Independent Film Tax Credit 34%; 53% for independent films under £15M
Ireland Section 481 32%, up to 40% for qualifying features under €20M
Canada Federal CPTC plus provincial credits 25% of labour federally, more with provincial credits
France TRIP (international productions) 30%, 40% with large VFX spend
Australia Location Offset; Producer Offset 30%; 40% for Australian features
USA (Georgia) Film Tax Credit Up to 30%, transferable
Saudi Arabia Saudi Film Commission cash rebate Up to 40%
Abu Dhabi Production rebate Up to 50%

Rates as of October 2026. They change often, so check the tax incentives by country page before planning.

Three things matter more than the headline rate. First, incentives are paid after the shoot, once an audit confirms the spend, so they can’t pay for principal photography directly; lenders will advance 80% to 90% of a confirmed incentive to close that gap. Second, the rate applies only to qualifying spend, which often leaves out non-resident talent, marketing and work done abroad, so the effective rate is lower. Third, incentives stack: a co-production can claim in two countries at once, and combinations such as UK and Ireland can cover a large share of the budget before any investor is approached.

Read more: Film production tax incentives by country · Private Briefing: Tax credits and incentives, inside the global rebate race

Crowdfunding

Kickstarter, Indiegogo and Seed&Spark let producers raise smaller sums straight from an audience. A campaign rarely covers more than a small slice of even a micro-budget film, and without an existing following most top out around $50,000 to $100,000. Its real value is proof. An investor who sees thousands of people pay for a film that doesn’t exist yet takes the project more seriously, and the campaign doubles as early marketing.

Read more: Best crowdfunding platforms for film production

Brand money

Brands now fund content directly, sometimes as an equity partner and sometimes as the studio itself. Red Bull, The North Face, Mailchimp and Crocs have all put money into films and series that fit their audience. Deals come in three shapes: a cash fee for placement or partnership rights, services in exchange for screen time, or co-financing where the brand takes a share and agreed creative approvals.

The trade-off is control. A brand partner wants its values reflected on screen, so agree approvals and exit rights in writing before the money lands. Commercial genre films, action titles, documentaries and family content draw the most interest.

Completion bonds

A completion bond is a guarantee to the financiers that the film will be finished and delivered on budget. If the production runs into trouble, the bond company can step in, take control of the shoot or cover the overrun. Lenders almost always require one, so it is part of the cost of borrowing. Expect it to add a small percentage of the budget, and expect the bond company to review the script, schedule, budget and key crew before it signs.

Read more: Completion financing for film: where to find it

Find financiers who fit your project

Give VIQI your budget, genre and territory, and it returns the funds, financiers and decision makers who fit, with their recent deals.

Try VIQI free →

How the money comes back: the recoupment waterfall

The waterfall is the agreed order in which everyone gets paid from the film’s revenue. It is negotiated before the shoot, written into the financing agreements, and run by a collection account manager once the money starts coming in. It decides who carries the real risk.

A typical independent film runs like this:

1

All revenue

Revenue from theatrical, streaming, TV, home entertainment and other sales lands in a collection account.

2

The sales agent and distributors

They take their fees, often 20% to 35%, and recover their marketing and delivery costs.

3

Senior and gap lenders

They are repaid in full, with interest, before any investor.

4

The completion bond company

It recovers anything it paid to cover an overrun.

5

Equity investors

They recover their money, usually with a premium, together and in proportion to what each put in. This is what “pro rata pari passu” means.

6

Deferred fees

They go to cast and crew who took part of their pay later.

7

Net profit

It is split, often 50/50 between the investors and the producers, with talent profit shares coming out of the producers’ half.

Most independent films never reach step 5. Fees and marketing costs take a large share of revenue first, which is why equity in indie film counts as high-risk money and why a fair waterfall matters as much as the funding itself.

Read more: The revenue waterfall in film distribution · Pro rata pari passu explained

Structuring the deal

The money is only as good as the paper behind it. Three terms cause most of the disputes on independent films, and each is easier to settle before anyone signs.

Define net profits in writing. “Net profits” means whatever the contract says it means. Distribution fees, overhead charges, interest and marketing costs can all be deducted before profit is calculated, and a loose definition can leave investors and talent with nothing on a film that made money. Spell out every deduction, cap the overheads, and show investors the definition alongside the waterfall.

Give investors rights without giving away the film. Investors reasonably want information, a say on major changes and protection if things go wrong. They should not get approval over the cut, the cast or the director unless that was part of the bargain. Good deals set out reporting (how often, what the investor sees), the specific decisions that need consent, and what happens if the producer breaches the agreement. Everything else stays with the producer.

Paper the deferrals. Deferred fees are real money owed. Write down who is deferring, how much, where they sit in the waterfall and when they get paid. A handshake deferral turns into a dispute the moment the film earns anything.

One more point: equity raised from private investors is usually treated as a securities offering. A production lawyer should prepare the investor documents before any money moves, in every territory involved.

Film financing by budget

The budget decides which tools are even on the table.

Budget Typical mix Lead source
Under $500,000 Grants, crowdfunding, small equity, deferrals Film commission and fund grants
$500,000 to $5M Pre-sales, soft money, equity Pre-sales through a sales agent
$5M to $30M Pre-sales, gap loan, co-production, incentives Gap lender
Over $30M Studio or streamer equity, output deals, slate money, bank debt Studio or platform

Under $500,000. Micro-budget films run on soft money, personal capital and deferred deals, where cast and crew take part of their pay later. Pre-sales are hard to get without a known producer or cast, so the plan starts with grants and regional funds. Horror has the best record at this level, and genre in general travels well. Our guide to short film financing covers the smallest projects.

$500,000 to $5M. The most crowded band in independent film. A sales agent becomes necessary, because pre-sales in the strongest markets drive the budget. Tax incentives can carry a large share if the production qualifies in the UK, Ireland or Canada. Expect six to twelve months to assemble the package.

$5M to $30M. Mid-budget films usually need a gap lender to close. By the time the producer meets one, the pre-sales, a tax credit certificate and often a co-production partner should already be in hand. Co-productions become worth the paperwork here, because partner territories can bring meaningful sums and their own incentives. Our report on the mid-budget comeback tracks how this band is recovering.

Over $30M. At this level a studio or streamer is almost always involved, as equity partner or distributor. Studios fund from their own balance sheet and judge a film by how it serves the whole slate, which lets them absorb losses an independent producer couldn’t. The price is control: notes, test screenings and often final cut. Slate financing sits here too, with private equity or funds backing five to ten films from one company so that one miss doesn’t sink the investment.

By format. Documentaries lean on broadcasters, grants and impact funds, covered in documentary film financing. Animation runs on longer timelines and heavier co-production, covered in how to get funding for animation. Unscripted TV has its own model, covered in how to fund a reality TV show.

A first film: the order that works

Most of the tools above assume a track record. Gap lenders want past credits and a completion bond. Sales agents want a recognisable cast. Funds prefer slates. First-time filmmakers have a different path, and the order matters more than the sources: budget first, soft money second, private investors third, pre-sales and incentives last.

Lock the budget before any funding conversation. A budget is a credibility signal. An inflated one reads as inexperience, and one that’s too low tells investors you haven’t thought about post-production, insurance or delivery. Under $1 million, a rough split is 20% to 30% above the line, 40% to 50% production, 20% to 25% post, and a 10% contingency you never cut. Research every line rather than estimating it.

Soft money and crowdfunding before equity. Film fund grants, arts council grants, broadcaster development money and festival labs (Sundance, Gotham, IFFR, Berlinale Talents) need no track record, only a strong project and a good application. Regional grants are small one by one, often $25,000 to $50,000, and they add up. Every grant you land is equity you don’t have to raise.

What a realistic $500,000 first film looks like:

Source Amount Share
Regional film fund grant $75,000 15%
Crowdfunding $30,000 6%
Private investor (angel) $150,000 30%
Personal and family money $50,000 10%
Tax incentive, advanced by a lender $100,000 20%
Deferred crew fees $95,000 19%

Gap loans, pre-sales and institutional debt are missing, and that is normal for a debut. Experienced crew sometimes defer fees on a first film as a calculated bet. They get the credit and the experience, and they get paid if the film sells. Have a production lawyer write it up.

The team is part of the package. Investors and grant panels judge a first film on whether it will actually get made. An experienced line producer attached early lowers that risk even when the director is new. A production lawyer who sorts chain of title and investor documents before money moves is a must.

Phil Hunt of Head Gear Films, which has financed more than 550 films, put the climate plainly on LeaderSpeak: “The whole industry has become much, much harder in terms of getting movies off the ground and getting movies sold.” His view is that a project the market wants, packaged by a team that has done its homework, can still get financed without a previous credit. Listen to Phil Hunt on LeaderSpeak.

Read more: The Indie Film Financing Playbook

Who provides film finance

Film money comes from a handful of company types. Knowing which one fits your project saves months of pitching the wrong people.

  • Sales and finance companies. International sales agents that also provide gap money or equity on the films they sell.
  • Agency finance arms. Talent agencies run media finance divisions that package equity and debt for films with their clients attached.
  • Specialist banks. Entertainment lending desks that lend against pre-sales, MGs and tax credits.
  • Film funds and family offices. Equity investors, from single-title funds to multi-picture slates.
  • Private equity. Company and slate deals, usually $10 million and up.
  • Distributors. Some acquire or co-finance the films they release, at festivals or from script.
  • Public funds and broadcasters. National film bodies, regional funds and broadcasters with a remit to back local production.

For names by market, see the directories on the hub: film financing companies worldwide, independent film financing companies, and country lists for the USA, UK and India.

Why most films don’t get funded

Financiers turn projects down for a small set of reasons, and almost none of them are about the script.

The budget doesn’t match the market. This is the complaint financiers raise most. A film that costs $20 million and can only sell for $5 million won’t close, however good it is. Financiers test a budget against what comparable films actually sold for, territory by territory.

The cast doesn’t give buyers confidence. Distributors pre-buy on cast. If the names attached don’t move the needle in the key markets, the pre-sales don’t come, and neither does the gap loan.

The structure is unclear. A plan that can’t say who is in which layer, on what terms and in what order reads as risk. Investors want to see the stack and the waterfall on one page.

The money runs out before the cameras roll. Development, legal and packaging costs eat through the seed money, and the project stalls with half the financing promised and none of it paid.

The legal groundwork isn’t done. Gaps in chain of title, uncleared rights or loose investor paperwork stop a close at the last step.

Andrea Scarso of IPR.VC, which has co-financed more than 15 films with A24, put it this way on LeaderSpeak: “The challenge in the industry right now is not on deal flow, it’s on the quality of investing, it’s on how you structure the investment.” Watch the IPR.VC episode. Our report on what film and TV financiers want in 2026 goes further.

Are you ready to raise? A ten-point check

Run through these before the first investor meeting. Each “no” is a question a financier will ask.

  • Can you describe the film, its audience and its comparable titles in two sentences?
  • Is the budget built line by line, with a contingency, and does it fit what comparable films sold for?
  • Do you have a draft capital stack showing every layer and its terms?
  • Have you checked which incentives and funds the project qualifies for, and their deadlines?
  • Do you know the project’s biggest risks and how each is covered (bond, insurance, contingency)?
  • Can you show a draft waterfall, with a written definition of net profits?
  • Is a sales agent, key cast or an experienced producer attached?
  • Is chain of title clean, and are investor documents prepared by a lawyer?
  • Do you have a one-page summary, a deck and a financial model ready to send?
  • Do you know which financiers have backed films like yours in the last two years?

Building the financing package, step by step

The order of these steps matters as much as the steps themselves. Investors move faster, and on better terms, when the safer layers are already signed.

Step 1Lock the budget and find the gap

Work out the budget with a line producer. Add up the soft money and tax credits you qualify for. What’s left is the gap you need to fill with pre-sales, debt and equity. Without a clear gap figure, no lender will engage.

Step 2Attach a sales agent

Their estimate of what each territory will pay is the base for pre-sales and gap lending. Pick one with recent sales in your genre and budget range, and get a letter of commitment.

Step 3Apply for incentives early

Applications can take weeks to process. Apply before you’re ready to shoot, because a confirmed incentive can sometimes support a loan before the rebate arrives.

Step 4Take signed pre-sales to lenders

Bring contracts, not letters of intent. Lenders will discount the sales agent’s estimates, often by a fifth or more, and ask for a completion bond, chain of title and a detailed budget.

Step 5Close equity last

Show investors the full waterfall, where they sit in it, comparable sales and your track record. An investor who sees 60% of the budget already secured is far easier to close than one asked to fund into a vacuum.

Step 6Appoint a collection account manager

A CAM collects revenue from every territory and pays each party according to the waterfall. Fees are typically around 0.5% to 1% of revenue, and lenders and investors take comfort from the independence.

Step 7Sign everything, then shoot

Start principal photography only once every agreement is signed, the funds are in place or in escrow, and the bond is active. Starting on partial financing is how productions stall halfway.

Common mistakes

Approaching investors in the wrong order. Equity expects to see soft money, incentives and pre-sales confirmed first. Going to them early weakens your hand.

Signing a sales agent without checking recent sales. If they haven’t sold films like yours in the past two years, their estimates won’t persuade a lender.

Forgetting the cost of the money. Lawyers, the CAM, loan fees, the bond premium and bank charges can add a meaningful slice on top of the production budget. A budget with no room for them runs short mid-process.

Counting a letter of intent as a pre-sale. Only a signed distribution agreement with a payment schedule works as collateral.

Bringing in a lawyer too late. Chain of title gaps and loose investor agreements can kill a deal at the last step, so bring a specialist entertainment lawyer in from development onward.

ESG and financing conditions

Sustainability and inclusion have moved from good practice to funding conditions in parts of the market. In the UK, the major broadcasters and streamers require productions to measure their carbon footprint with BAFTA albert. Public funders such as the BFI and Eurimages build sustainability plans into their awards, and some US incentive programs pay a bonus for hiring from local training schemes. A small but growing group of funds and family offices screens projects on these criteria before investing.

The requirements aren’t standardised, so a film with a UK broadcaster, a European fund and a US investor can face three different sets. Keep one file ready from greenlight: a carbon plan, a written sustainability plan, and an honest statement of your inclusion commitments. Most of it doubles as ordinary production planning.

Where to find the money

Knowing the sources is half the job. The other half is knowing who is actively writing cheques this quarter, in your territory, for your kind of project, and who at that company makes the call.

The Vitrina film financing hub brings that together: financier lists by type and country, Private Briefings with the people doing the deals, and LeaderSpeak episodes with financiers on the record. Our guide on how to find private investors for your film covers the outreach itself.

Match your project to named financiers

To match your project to named financiers, ask VIQI. Give it the budget, genre and territory, and it returns the funds, financiers and decision makers who fit, with their recent deals.

Try VIQI free →
Talk to Concierge →

FAQ

How long does it take to finance an independent film?

For a $500,000 to $5M film, six to twelve months is common once a sales agent is attached. A first film built on grants can take longer, because fund deadlines set the pace.

Who gets paid first when a film makes money?

The sales agent and distributors take their fees and costs, then lenders are repaid with interest. Equity investors come after that, so they carry the most risk.

What is a capital stack in film?

The full list of money in a film, ordered by who is repaid first: senior debt, then mezzanine and gap money, then equity, with soft money alongside that is usually never repaid.

Can a first-time filmmaker get gap financing?

Rarely. Gap lenders want a producer with past credits, a sales agent’s estimates and a completion bond. Most debut films are funded by grants, private investors and a tax incentive instead.

What is the difference between a cost-plus deal and a licence deal?

In a cost-plus deal, a streamer pays the full budget plus a premium and keeps most of the rights. In a licence deal, the producer finances the film, keeps ownership and licenses it for set territories and years.

Do tax incentives have to be paid back?

No. They are a rebate on money spent in that country. They arrive after the shoot, which is why producers often borrow against them during production.

About the Author

Vitrina Research Team

The Vitrina Research Team produces intelligence-led analysis on media and entertainment industry structure, deal activity, and market trends. Our research draws on VIQI’s proprietary dataset of 300,000+ M&E companies worldwide.